Home » Football » A.D. Isidro Metapan vs CD FAS – Betting Analysis

A.D. Isidro Metapan vs CD FAS – Betting Analysis

Analysis of A.D. Isidro Metapan vs CD FAS Match

The upcoming football match between A.D. Isidro Metapan and CD FAS is anticipated to be a highly competitive encounter, as suggested by the betting odds. With a variety of betting segments available, we can derive insights into expected game dynamics and potential outcomes. The odds indicate a balanced match, with both teams having reasonable chances of scoring, yet also significant probabilities for defensive plays, especially in the second half.

A.D. Isidro Metapan

LWLLW
-

CD FAS

WDLDW
Date: 2025-09-21
Time: 01:00
(FT)
Venue: Estadio Jorge Calero Suarez
Score: 2-3

Predictions:

MarketPredictionOddResult
Both Teams Not To Score In 2nd Half92.60%(2-3)
Over 1.5 Goals79.70%(2-3) 1.36
Over 0.5 Goals HT79.00%(2-3) 0-1 1H 1.48
Away Team To Score In 2nd Half65.30%(2-3)
Over 2.5 Goals67.10%(2-3) 2.20
Both Teams To Score66.30%(2-3) 1.91
Both Teams Not To Score In 1st Half60.90%(2-3)
Home Team Not To Score In 2nd Half58.40%(2-3)
Home Team To Score In 1st Half61.50%(2-3)
Over 2.5 BTTS59.00%(2-3) 2.60
Over 1.5 Goals HT54.40%(2-3) 0-1 1H 3.00
Under 4.5 Cards51.10%(2-3)
Under 5.5 Cards49.10%(2-3)
Avg. Total Goals4.41%(2-3)
Avg. Goals Scored2.33%(2-3)
Avg. Conceded Goals1.38%(2-3)
Red Cards1.13%(2-3)

Betting Insights

Goals and Scoring Trends

  • Both Teams Not To Score In 2nd Half (92.10): This high probability suggests that both teams are expected to score in the first half or that the second half may see a more defensive approach.
  • Over 1.5 Goals (82.00): The likelihood of seeing more than 1.5 goals indicates an offensive game, with at least three goals likely.
  • Over 0.5 Goals HT (82.00): Reflects an expectation of an active first half with at least one goal.
  • Away Team To Score In 2nd Half (67.40): Points towards a strategy where CD FAS might capitalize on a second-half advantage or counter-attack.
  • Over 2.5 Goals (66.50): Suggests that the match could be high-scoring, with a total of at least three goals expected.
  • Both Teams To Score (66.00): Indicates both teams have strong attacking capabilities and are likely to find the net.
  • Both Teams Not To Score In 1st Half (62.10): Implies a cautious start with potential buildup to later goals.
  • Avg. Total Goals (4.01): Reinforces the expectation of a goal-rich encounter.
  • Avg. Goals Scored (2.23) and Avg. Conceded Goals (1.78): Reflects past performances where both teams have been involved in moderately high-scoring games.

Defensive and Disciplinary Insights

  • Home Team Not To Score In 2nd Half (58.50): Implies A.D. Isidro Metapan might focus on consolidating their lead if they score in the first half or face strong defensive pressure from CD FAS.
  • Home Team To Score In 1st Half (60.30): Suggests A.D. Isidro Metapan could leverage their home advantage early on.
  • Over 2.5 BTTS (56.10) and Over 1.5 Goals HT (55.20): Indicates expectations for frequent scoring opportunities throughout the match, particularly in the first half.
  • Under 4.5 Cards (53.70) and Under 5.5 Cards (54.40): Points towards disciplined play with limited fouls leading to yellow or red cards.
  • Avg. Red Cards (0.73): Suggests a relatively controlled match with few severe infractions expected.

Predictions for the Match

The analysis of betting odds provides several predictions for this match:

  • The second half is likely to be less goal-intensive compared to the first half, given the high odds for “Both Teams Not To Score In 2nd Half.”
  • A dynamic first half is expected with “Over 0.5 Goals HT” being a strong possibility, indicating early goal-scoring action.
  • The total number of goals is predicted to exceed 2.5, reflecting both teams’ attacking prowess and previous scoring trends.
  • Cautious tactics might be employed by both teams in the second half, focusing on defense rather than aggressive play, as suggested by “Home Team Not To Score In 2nd Half.”
  • The likelihood of disciplined play is indicated by low card expectations, suggesting minimal disruptions from referee decisions.

UFC