The upcoming match between Qingdao Red Lions and Guangxi Pingguo Haliao FC is set to be an intriguing encounter in the Chinese Super League. Both teams have had a mixed start to the season, with Qingdao Red Lions showing a solid home performance while Guangxi Pingguo Haliao FC has struggled on the road. Injuries and suspensions are minimal, allowing both managers to field their strongest line-ups. Tactically, Qingdao will likely focus on maintaining possession and exploiting counter-attacks, while Guangxi may adopt a more defensive approach to nullify their opponent’s threats. The tempo of the game is expected to be balanced, with both teams wary of conceding early goals.
Qingdao Red Lions
Guangxi Pingguo Haliao FC
(FT)
Predictions:
Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
---|---|---|---|
Both Teams Not To Score In 1st Half | 85.10% | (1-1) 1-1 1H 1.17 | |
Both Teams Not To Score In 2nd Half | 81.30% | (1-1) 0-0 2H 1.25 | |
Home Team Not To Score In 1st Half | 83.10% | (1-1) | |
Away Team Not To Score In 2nd Half | 73.00% | (1-1) | |
Away Team Not To Score In 1st Half | 77.20% | (1-1) | |
Under 2.5 Goals | 73.40% | (1-1) 1.68 | |
Home Team Not To Score In 2nd Half | 68.90% | (1-1) | |
Both Teams Not to Score | 65.70% | (1-1) 1.87 | |
Draw In First Half | 56.50% | (1-1) 1-1 1H 2.00 | |
Goal In Last 15 Minutes | 54.70% | (1-1) | |
Last Goal 73+ Minutes | 55.50% | (1-1) | |
Avg. Total Goals | 2.66% | (1-1) | |
Avg. Conceded Goals | 1.53% | (1-1) | |
Avg. Goals Scored | 1.23% | (1-1) | |
Red Cards | 0.54% | (1-1) |
Match Result (1X2)
Data Signals
Recent form indicates that Qingdao has won 60% of their home games this season, while Guangxi has only secured victory in 20% of their away matches. The average goals scored by Qingdao at home is 2.1, suggesting they are capable of securing a win.
Risk Factors
The primary risk for Qingdao is over-reliance on their home advantage, which could lead to complacency. For Guangxi, their defensive vulnerabilities could be exploited by Qingdao’s attacking players.
Recommended Picks
Given the data, betting on Qingdao to win appears to be a safe bet. The odds reflect this sentiment, making it an attractive option for bettors.
Draw No Bet
Data Signals
The draw no bet market is influenced by the fact that both teams have a tendency to play cautiously in high-stakes matches. Qingdao’s defensive solidity at home and Guangxi’s ability to hold off opponents could lead to a draw.
Risk Factors
The main risk here is underestimating the attacking capabilities of both teams, which could lead to unexpected goals and a loss for those betting on a draw no bet.
Recommended Picks
Considering the defensive trends and cautious play expected from both sides, the draw no bet option offers a balanced risk-reward scenario.
Double Chance
Data Signals
The double chance market favors outcomes where either Qingdao wins or draws, or Guangxi draws or wins. This reflects the unpredictable nature of matches between these two teams.
Risk Factors
The risk lies in potential upsets due to unexpected tactical changes or player performances that could sway the match outcome.
Recommended Picks
Betting on Qingdao to win or draw provides a safer option given their home advantage and recent form.
Both Teams To Score
Data Signals
The odds suggest that while both teams have the potential to score, it is not guaranteed. Qingdao averages 1.23 goals per game, while Guangxi concedes 1.53 goals on average.
Risk Factors
The risk is primarily due to potential defensive improvements by Guangxi or a lack of finishing from Qingdao’s attackers.
Recommended Picks
Given the likelihood of both teams finding the net at some point during the match, this market offers a viable betting opportunity.
Total Goals (Over/Under)
Data Signals
The average total goals in matches involving these teams is 2.66, slightly above the 2.5 goal threshold. This suggests an over 2.5 market might be worth considering.
Risk Factors
The risk involves potential tactical conservatism from either team, leading to fewer goals than expected.
Recommended Picks
Betting on over 2.5 goals aligns with historical data and current form, making it a reasonable choice for bettors seeking higher returns.
Asian Handicap
Data Signals
The Asian Handicap market reflects Qingdao’s strong home performance and Guangxi’s struggles away from home. A -0.5 handicap for Qingdao seems justified based on recent results.
Risk Factors
The risk lies in potential overconfidence from Qingdao or an unexpected resurgence from Guangxi that could negate the handicap advantage.
Recommended Picks
A -0.5 handicap for Qingdao offers a balanced approach, capitalizing on their home strength while accounting for possible fluctuations in performance.
Player Props
Data is insufficient for detailed analysis in this segment due to limited available statistics on individual player performances in recent matches.
Corners
Limited data is available regarding corner trends for these teams in recent fixtures, making it difficult to provide a comprehensive analysis for this betting segment.
Cards
The average number of red cards per match involving these teams is 0.54, suggesting caution among players and referees alike.
Data Signals
This low average indicates disciplined play from both sides, reducing the likelihood of seeing multiple cards in this match.
Risk Factors
Risks include unexpected aggressive play leading to more cards than anticipated, potentially affecting team dynamics and performance.
Recommended Picks
Betting on fewer than one red card aligns with historical trends and current disciplinary records.
Half-Time/Full-Time
Limited data prevents a thorough analysis of half-time/full-time outcomes for this match due to inconsistent patterns in previous fixtures.
Last Goal 73+ Minutes
Data Signals
The odds suggest there’s a reasonable chance for the last goal to be scored after the 73rd minute, reflecting potential late-game strategies or fatigue-induced mistakes.
Risk Factors
Risks include early decisive goals that could shift team tactics away from late-game offensive plays.
Recommended Picks
Betting on the last goal being scored after 73 minutes offers value based on historical late-game scoring trends.