The upcoming match between Shahrdari Noshahr and Mes Shahr-e Babak is set to take place on October 13, 2025, at 12:30. Both teams are entering this encounter with varying degrees of recent form and tactical setups that could influence the game’s outcome. Shahrdari Noshahr has shown a trend towards defensive solidity in their recent matches, while Mes Shahr-e Babak has been more aggressive but less consistent. Injuries and suspensions are not prominently affecting either side, allowing for full-strength lineups. The tactical approach for Shahrdari Noshahr might focus on maintaining defensive discipline, leveraging their home advantage to control the tempo of the game. Mes Shahr-e Babak, on the other hand, could look to exploit any gaps in the opposition’s defense with swift counterattacks. The expected game state suggests a low-scoring affair, with a slow tempo likely dictating the flow of play.
Shahrdari Noshahr
Mes Shahr-e Babak
Predictions:
| Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Both Teams Not To Score In 1st Half | 97.80% | Make Bet | |
| Under 2.5 Goals | 89.40% | 1.29 Make Bet | |
| Both Teams Not to Score | 87.90% | 1.40 Make Bet | |
| Under 1.5 Goals | 86.90% | 1.93 Make Bet | |
| Sum of Goals Under 2 | 85.70% | Make Bet | |
| Both Teams Not To Score In 2nd Half | 82.40% | Make Bet | |
| Away Team Not To Score In 1st Half | 64.20% | Make Bet | |
| Away Team Not To Score In 2nd Half | 65.60% | Make Bet | |
| Home Team Not To Score In 1st Half | 65.70% | Make Bet | |
| Home Team To Score In 2nd Half | 67.70% | Make Bet | |
| Avg. Total Goals | 1.40% | Make Bet | |
| Avg. Goals Scored | 0.97% | Make Bet | |
| Avg. Conceded Goals | 1.34% | Make Bet |
Match Result (1X2)
Data Signals
Given the predictions, there’s a strong indication that both teams will be cautious, aiming to keep the scoreline low. The data suggests that neither side is likely to dominate possession or create numerous clear-cut chances.
Risk Factors
The primary risk lies in overestimating Mes Shahr-e Babak’s offensive capabilities, given their recent inconsistency in scoring. Additionally, betting on a high-scoring game would be risky due to the low average total goals predicted.
Recommended Picks
Based on the data, backing a low-scoring outcome such as “Under 1.5 Goals” or “Both Teams Not to Score” seems prudent. These options align well with the predicted average goals and defensive trends of both teams.
Total Goals (Over/Under)
Data Signals
The average total goals prediction stands at 1.40, which supports a trend towards fewer goals being scored in this match. This aligns with the broader betting predictions favoring low-scoring outcomes.
Risk Factors
The risk here is betting on an over scenario when the data heavily leans towards an under scenario. Given the defensive setups and recent form of both teams, expecting more than 2 goals would be speculative.
Recommended Picks
The safest bet would be “Under 2.5 Goals,” which has a high probability according to the data provided. This option reflects the anticipated cautious playstyle from both teams.
Both Teams To Score
Data Signals
The likelihood of both teams scoring is relatively low, as indicated by the predictions for “Both Teams Not To Score” and related bets. This suggests that either team may struggle to find the back of the net.
Risk Factors
Betting on both teams to score could be risky given the defensive strategies expected from both sides. The data does not support frequent goal-scoring opportunities for either team.
Recommended Picks
Opting for “Both Teams Not To Score” aligns with the majority of betting predictions and reflects the anticipated defensive nature of this match.
Average Goals Analysis
Data Signals
The average goals scored and conceded figures (0.97 and 1.34 respectively) suggest a tight contest with limited goal-scoring opportunities for both teams.
Risk Factors
The risk lies in overestimating either team’s offensive output based on these averages, which might lead to incorrect betting decisions.
Recommended Picks
Focusing on bets that align with these averages, such as “Under 1.5 Goals,” would be advisable given the expected low-scoring nature of this encounter.
